Thursday, May 10, 2012

The Other Side of Making Things...

Okay, so I was on a soapbox about LEGO CUUSOO (more about the community than the site) on the previous blog post. Now I am going to another website where things seem to be a little clear-cut.

Kickstarter is a site where people can submit projects that can be funded. The threshold is determined by the project leaders, and the time limit is variable (I think). There are projects in every field, and there are a growing number of LEGO-related projects going online. Here are some projects worth note:

Little Guys...in Space! A LEGO® Fan Film from Paganomation - a film being proposed by David Pagano, a brick animator who was part of BrickJournal 14. This project is close to deadline, so if you want to support it, act soon!






STUDS Collectible Cards - a set of trading cards proposed by Brandon Griffith, who was in BrickJournal 6. The cards are of AFOLs and community, and I was asked to be one of the cards as well as BrickJournal! I think this is a great idea, as these could be sold and and seen at events...how cool would that be?




I am a supporter of the above projects and encourage others to join. There's other projects too, so go look!

For me, the question I see here is whether or not the Kickstarter model of donating funding is a better model than the LEGO CUUSOO model of voting. There are pros and cons to either way:

LEGO CUUSOO:
Pros: 
1. Doesn't require any money.
2. Easy to vote.
3. Specifically LEGO, so a set would be an official LEGO set

Cons:
1. No guarantee of production, just review
2. No indication of practicality on a proposed set - a zillion part set isn't given any deference (when it should...any set over 1000 parts becomes a costly set, which I woudl think would make it harder to pass muster)
3. No real vestment by voters - when they say they will buy doesn't mean they will...

Kickstarter:
Pros:
1. Funders have a vested interest in success.
2. Easy to vote
3. Can be a LEGO-related item, not LEGO specific

Cons:
1. Funding may not be successful
2. Not official LEGO associated company
3. Need money to participate


So which one is better? Depends on what you want. If you want a set, LEGO CUUSOO is the only way to go, but it's tough. If you want something else, Kickstarter is a way to go that may not be as hard, depending on the funding target and the validity of the idea.


Thoughts?


2 comments:

Mrviscom78 said...

I have had a Kickstarter campaign and have several Cuusoo Projects. I do not think it is easy to sign up for either Kickstarter or Cuusoo. It is much harder to sign up for Kickstarter because a bank account must be associated with the account to pay for the product or service. Cuusoo's voting is to gauge interest in a product. The biggest problem Cuusoo has is that The Lego Groups main audience is boys 5 to 10. This is not who is voting on the projects. The biggest problem with Kickstarter is getting the right customer to the site.

Mrviscom78 said...

http://lego.cuusoo.com/ideas/view/34805